China’s AI Takes the Stand: The Global Battle Over Machine-Made Justice

Chinese scientists and legal scholars have contributed to a landmark comparative study that scrutinizes how different jurisdictions are grappling with a single, urgent question: when an AI system helps decide a case, does a citizen have the right to know why?

Published in Computer Law & Security Review, the paper “Comparing the right to an explanation of judicial AI by function; studies on the EU, Brazil, and China” offers the first systematic examination of how three major legal systems approach explainability in AI-assisted judicial decision-making. The study, co-authored by researchers including Cong-rui Qiao, moves beyond simple comparisons of data-protection laws to classify judicial AI by its function — whether it merely assists judges or effectively replaces human discretion. This functional taxonomy reveals a critical divergence: while the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides a relatively robust framework for demanding explanations, China’s legal architecture, still in rapid evolution, takes a more pragmatic, state-oriented approach that prioritizes efficiency and social stability. Brazil’s recent data protection law, inspired by the GDPR, occupies a middle ground but faces significant implementation challenges.

Why it matters:
For investors, policymakers, and technology vendors operating in China’s burgeoning legal-tech market, the absence of a legally codified “right to explanation” signals both an opportunity and a risk. Companies developing AI tools for court systems in China will need to navigate a regulatory environment that values algorithmic transparency differently than Western markets. As China pushes to digitize its judicial process — already one of the world’s busiest — the standards it ultimately adopts will influence how legal AI is built, deployed, and trusted across the developing world.

Source →